Direito ambiental e sustentabilidade: uma visão geral da literatura

Anrafel de Souza Barbosa; Matheus Simões Nunes

doi:10.58203/Licuri.839218

Direito ambiental e sustentabilidade: uma visão geral da literatura

Autores

Anrafel de Souza Barbosa Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Matheus Simões Nunes Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Universidade Estadual do Mato Grosso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58203/Licuri.839218

Palavras-chave:

meio ambiente, política pública, gestão ambiental

Resumo

Ao longo das últimas décadas, o Direito Ambiental tem contribuído significativamente para limitar os impactos ambientais do nosso modo de vida. No entanto, os problemas ambientais ainda prevalecem e estão fortemente ligados aos nossos sistemas de produção e consumo. Desta forma, o principal objetivo deste artigo foi mapear e analisar a literatura sobre o Direito Ambiental e Sustentabilidade. A metodologia utilizada seguiu as diretrizes dos Itens de Relatório Preferidos para Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises – PRISMA, baseada em uma amostra de artigos científicos extraída das bases de conhecimentos científicos Web of Science (WoS) e Scopus. Os resultados obtidos desta pesquisa revelaram que o mundo está investindo em Sustentabilidade e esta atitude está promovendo vários ganhos importantes e interessantes com o apoio oferecidos pelo Direito Ambiental. Concluindo-se que o Direito Ambiental é uma ferramenta adequada para minimizar os conflitos de interesses dos stakeholders em relação à Sustentabilidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ADEBAYO, T. S.; RJOUB, H. A new perspective into the impact of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on environmental degradation in Argentina: a time–frequency analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 29, n. 11, p. 16028–16044, 2022.

AGUILA, Y. A Global Pact for the Environment: The Logical Outcome of 50 Years of International Environmental Law. Sustainability, 2020.

AHMED, Z.; LE, H. P. Linking Information Communication Technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 28, n. 7, p. 8770–8781, 2021.

AKADIRI, S. SAINT et al. Impacts of globalization and energy consumption on environmental degradation: what is the way forward to achieving environmental sustainability targets in Nigeria? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022.

ALI, S. et al. Environment management policy implementation for sustainable industrial production under power asymmetry in the graph model. Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 29, p. 636–648, 2022.

AUDZEI, H. The Role of Environmental Law Education for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, v. 8, n. 3, p. 79, 2019.

BARBOSA, A. D. S. et al. Integrated Management Systems : their organizational impacts. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, v. 32, n. 5–6, p. 1–24, 2021.

BÖLTER, S. G.; DERANI, C. Environmental law and sustainable development: An analysis of the judicialization of social relations. Veredas do Direito, v. 15, n. 33, p. 209–242, 2018.

BRAND, U.; WISSEN, M.; WORLD, T. O. What Kind of Great Transformation? The Imperial Mode of Living as a Major Obstacle to Sustainability Politics. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, p. 287–292, 2018.

CARVALHO, M. M.; FLEURY, A.; LOPES, A. P. An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 80, n. 7, p. 1418–1437, 2013.

CHNG, K.; ONG, K. W. The Singapore Green Plan 2030: Analysing its implications on law and the legal industry in Singapore. Environmental Law Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 336–343, 2021.

CITHERLET, S.; DEFAUX, T. Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Building and Environment, v. 42, n. 2, p. 591–598, 2007.

CULLET, P. Confronting inequality beyond sustainable development: The case for eco-human rights and differentiation. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, v. 31, n. 1, p. 7–15, 2022.

DECARO, D. A. et al. Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and Society, v. 22, n. 1, 2017.

FUKUDA-PARR, S. From the Millennium Development Goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development, v. 24, n. 1, p. 43–52, 2016.

GARSKE, B.; STUBENRAUCH, J.; EKARDT, F. Sustainable phosphorus management in European agricultural and environmental law. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, v. 29, n. 1, p. 107–117, 2020.

GEELS, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 8–9, p. 1257–1274, 2002.

GIUPPONI, B. O. Fostering environmental democracy in latin america and the caribbean: An analysis of the regional agreement on environmental access rights. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, v. 28, n. 2, p. 136–151, 2019.

HE, M. Sustainable Development through the Right to Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in China. Sustainability, 2019.

HENN, E. V. Protecting forests or saving trees? The EU’s regulatory approach to global deforestation. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, v. 30, n. 3, p. 336–348, 2021.

HÖHNE, N. et al. Emissions: world has four times the work or one-third of the time. Nature, v. 579, p. 25–28, 2020.

KHAN, M. I.; XU, Q. An assessment of environmental policy implications under the China-Pakistan economic corridor: A perspective of environmental laws and sustainable development. Sustainability, 2021.

KOFF, H. et al. How green are our laws? Presenting a normative coherence for sustainable development methodology. Environmental Policy and Governance, n. April, p. 1–20, 2022.

KOFF, H.; HÄBEL, S. Normative coherence for development: What relevance for responsive regionalism? Development Policy Review, v. 40, n. S1, p. 1–10, 2022.

KOTLÁN, P.; KOZLOVÁ, A.; MACHOVÁ, Z. Opening a Path towards Sustainable Corporate Behaviour: Public Participation in Criminal Environmental Proceedings. Sustainability, 2021.

LÄHTEENMÄKI-UUTELA, A. et al. Legal rights of private property owners vs. sustainability transitions? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 323, n. August 2020, 2021.

LEE, C. C.; ZENG, M.; WANG, C. Environmental regulation, innovation capability, and green total factor productivity: New evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, p. 39384–39399, 2022.

LUDWIG, G. The role of law in transformative environmental policies-A case study of “Timber in buildings construction in Germany”. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 11, n. 3, p. 1–14, 2019.

MAN LI, R. Y. et al. The impact of sustainability awareness and moral values on environmental laws. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 11, 2021.

MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, v. 8, n. 5, p. 336–341, 2010.

MORIOKA, S. N.; DE CARVALHO, M. M. A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 136, p. 134–146, 2016.

NUNES, D. H.; LEHFELD, L. DE S. O Programa De Regularização Ambiental (PRA) Como Novo Modelo De Recuperação Do Passivo Ambiental: Falência Do “Punir Para Conscientizar”Veredas do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 2018.

PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, v. 372, 2021.

RAJAMANI, L. et al. National ‘fair shares’ in reducing greenhouse gas emissions within the principled framework of international environmental law. Climate Policy ISSN:, 2021.

RAMMEL, C.; STAUDINGER, M. Evolution, variability and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 301–313, 2002.

SARKODIE, S. A.; STREZOV, V. Empirical study of the Environmental Kuznets curve and Environmental Sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 201, p. 98–110, 2018.

SARKODIE, S. A.; STREZOV, V. A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, v. 649, p. 128–145, 2019.

YADAV, S. S.; GJERDE, K. M. The ocean, climate change and resilience: Making ocean areas beyond national jurisdiction more resilient to climate change and other anthropogenic activities. Marine Policy, v. 122, n. August, p. 104184, 2020.

ZABALZA BRIBIÁN, I.; VALERO CAPILLA, A.; ARANDA USÓN, A. Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1133–1140, 2011.

ZHAI, T.; CHANG, Y. C. The contribution of China’s civil law to sustainable development: Progress and prospectsSustainability (Switzerland), 2019.